Zammad vs TeamworkDesk

Choosing between Zammad and TeamworkDesk? Both platforms can work for customer support teams, but they usually fit different company sizes, workflows, and budget expectations.

Open-sourceModern UISelf-hostedEmailProjectsCollaboration

When to choose Zammad

  • Open-source with genuinely modern UI
  • Email, chat, Twitter, Facebook, phone in one place
  • AGPL licensed — truly free

When to choose TeamworkDesk

  • Integrates with Teamwork Projects
  • Clean interface
  • Shared inboxes

Key differences between Zammad and TeamworkDesk

FactorZammadTeamworkDesk
Best fitsmall teams and budget-conscious organizationssmall and mid-sized support teams
Starting priceFrom $5/agent/moFrom $15/agent/mo
G2-style rating4.6/54.5/5
Main focusticket management, collaboration, and support operationsAI-assisted support and automation
Categoryfreesmb

Zammad limitations

  • Self-hosting requires Linux skills
  • Cloud version is pricier
  • PostgreSQL-only from v7

TeamworkDesk limitations

  • Standalone weaker than dedicated helpdesks
  • Best only if using Teamwork

Switching from Zammad to TeamworkDesk or the other way around?

Use Help Desk Migration to move tickets, customers, agents, groups, comments, attachments, and historical support data with less manual work.

Plan a migration

Related comparisons

Popular comparisons