Zammad vs SherpaDesk

Choosing between Zammad and SherpaDesk? Both platforms can work for customer support teams, but they usually fit different company sizes, workflows, and budget expectations.

Open-sourceModern UISelf-hostedFree tierTime trackingInvoicing

When to choose Zammad

  • Open-source with genuinely modern UI
  • Email, chat, Twitter, Facebook, phone in one place
  • AGPL licensed — truly free

When to choose SherpaDesk

  • Free for 1 tech
  • Good time tracking and invoicing
  • Simple

Key differences between Zammad and SherpaDesk

FactorZammadSherpaDesk
Best fitsmall teams and budget-conscious organizationsIT and internal service teams
Starting priceFrom $5/agent/moFree plan / low-cost entry
G2-style rating4.6/54.6/5
Main focusticket management, collaboration, and support operationsITSM workflows, service requests, and asset-related support
Categoryfreefree, itsm

Zammad limitations

  • Self-hosting requires Linux skills
  • Cloud version is pricier
  • PostgreSQL-only from v7

SherpaDesk limitations

  • Dated UI
  • Limited advanced features

Switching from Zammad to SherpaDesk or the other way around?

Use Help Desk Migration to move tickets, customers, agents, groups, comments, attachments, and historical support data with less manual work.

Plan a migration

Related comparisons

Popular comparisons