NinjaOne vs Request Tracker

Choosing between NinjaOne and Request Tracker? Both platforms can work for customer support teams, but they usually fit different company sizes, workflows, and budget expectations.

RMMMSPEndpointOpen-sourcePerlLegacy

When to choose NinjaOne

  • Top-rated RMM on G2 (4.8)
  • Excellent endpoint management
  • Great UI
  • 17k+ customers

When to choose Request Tracker

  • Open-source
  • Battle-tested enterprise tool
  • Highly customizable

Key differences between NinjaOne and Request Tracker

FactorNinjaOneRequest Tracker
Best fitIT and internal service teamsIT and internal service teams
Starting priceCustom pricingFree plan / low-cost entry
G2-style rating4.8/54/5
Main focusITSM workflows, service requests, and asset-related supportITSM workflows, service requests, and asset-related support
Categoryitsmfree, itsm

NinjaOne limitations

  • Ticketing is basic
  • Not a full helpdesk
  • Best with a PSA add-on

Request Tracker limitations

  • Very dated UI
  • Requires Perl knowledge
  • Steep setup

Switching from NinjaOne to Request Tracker or the other way around?

Use Help Desk Migration to move tickets, customers, agents, groups, comments, attachments, and historical support data with less manual work.

Plan a migration

Related comparisons

Popular comparisons